Published May 21, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Artificial intelligence supported single detector multi-energy proton radiography system

  • 1. KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 2. UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging Radiotherapy and Oncology Lab, Brussels (Belgium)
  • 3. Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol (Belgium)

Description

Proton radiography imaging was proposed as a promising technique to evaluate internal anatomical changes, to enable pre-treatment patient alignment, and most importantly, to optimize the patient specific CT number to stopping-power ratio conversion. The clinical implementation rate of proton radiography systems is still limited due to their complex bulky design, together with the persistent problem of (in)elastic nuclear interactions and multiple Coulomb scattering (i.e. range mixing). In this work, a compact multi-energy proton radiography system was proposed in combination with an artificial intelligence network architecture (ProtonDSE) to remove the persistent problem of proton scatter in proton radiography. A realistic Monte Carlo model of the Proteus®One accelerator was built at 200 and 220 MeV to isolate the scattered proton signal in 236 proton radiographies of 80 digital anthropomorphic phantoms. ProtonDSE was trained to predict the proton scatter distribution at two beam energies in a 60%/25%/15% scheme for training, testing, and validation. A calibration procedure was proposed to derive the water equivalent thickness image based on the detector dose response relationship at both beam energies. ProtonDSE network performance was evaluated with quantitative metrics that showed an overall mean absolute percentage error below 1.4% ± 0.4% in our test dataset. For one example patient, detector dose to WET conversions were performed based on the total dose ( I T o t a l ), the primary proton dose ( I P r i m a r y ), and the ProtonDSE corrected detector dose ( I C o r r e c t e d ). The determined WET accuracy was compared with respect to the reference WET by idealistic raytracing in a manually delineated region-of-interest inside the brain. The error was determined 4.3% ± 4.1% for W E T ( I T o t a l ) , 2.2% ± 1.4% for WET ( I P r i m a r y ) , and 2.5% ± 2.0% for W E T ( I C o r r e c t e d ) . (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abe918

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Journal Volume
66
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
[12 p.]
ISSN
0031-9155
CODEN
PHMBA7