Published March 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

A dynamic multi-agent approach for modeling the evolution of multi-hazard accident scenarios in chemical plants

  • 1. Safety and Security Science Group, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, Delft (Netherlands)
  • 2. CEDON, KULeuven, Campus Brussels, Brussels (Belgium)
  • 3. Faculty of Applied Economics, Antwerp Research Group on Safety and Security (ARGoSS), University Antwerp, Antwerp (Belgium)
  • 4. School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto (Canada)

Description

Highlights: • A multi-agent method is developed for modeling multi-hazard in chemical plants. • The method is based on dynamic graph and Monte Carlo simulation (DGMC). • The spatial-temporal evolution of hazards arising from toxic release are considered. • The vulnerability of humans and installations subject to multi-hazard can be obtained. • Different personal protective equipment may be formulated for different people. In the chemical industry, multi-hazard (toxic, flammable, and explosive) materials such as acrylonitrile are stored, transported, and processed in large quantities. A release of multi-hazard materials can simultaneously or sequentially lead to acute toxicity, fire and explosion. The spatial-temporal evolution of hazards may also result in cascading effects. In this study, a dynamic methodology called "Dynamic Graph Monte Carlo" (DGMC) is developed to model the evolution of multi-hazard accident scenarios and assess the vulnerability of humans and installations exposed to such hazards. In the DGMC model, chemical plants are modeled as a multi-agent system with three kinds of agents: hazardous installations, ignition sources, and humans while considering the uncertainties and interdependencies among the agents and their impacts on the evolution of hazards and possible escalation effects. A case study is analyzed using the DGMC methodology, demonstrating that the risk can be underestimated if the spatial-temporal evolution of multi-hazard scenarios is neglected. Vapor cloud explosion (VCEs) may lead to more severe damage than fire, and the safety distances which are implemented only based on fire hazards are not sufficient to prevent from the damage of VCEs.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107349

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2020.107349;
PII
S0951832020308401;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
207
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54018493
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING; S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
Descriptors DEI
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL PLANTS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; FIRE HAZARDS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
CALCULATION METHODS; HAZARDS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; INDUSTRY; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.