Published February 1, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Quality of Survival and Growth in Children and Young Adults in the PNET4 European Controlled Trial of Hyperfractionated Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma

  • 1. University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, Southampton (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Neurophysiology, University of Pierre et Marie-Curie Paris 6, Paris (France)
  • 3. Hôpitaux de Saint Maurice, Saint Maurice (France)
  • 4. Kinder- und Jugendklinik der Universität Erlangen, Erlangen (Germany)
  • 5. Institut Curie and University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité (France)
  • 6. Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig (Germany)
  • 7. Department of Pediatrics, The Sahlgren Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg (Sweden)
  • 8. Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (Italy)
  • 9. Hospital Universitario Cruces, Baracaldo-Vizcaya (Spain)
  • 10. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg (Germany)
  • 11. Center for Pediatric Endocrinology, University College London, London (United Kingdom)
  • 12. Pediatric Oncology, University of Muenster, Muenster (Germany)

Description

Purpose: To compare quality of survival in "standard-risk" medulloblastoma after hyperfractionated radiation therapy of the central nervous system with that after standard radiation therapy, combined with a chemotherapy regimen common to both treatment arms, in the PNET4 randomised controlled trial. Methods and Materials: Participants in the PNET4 trial and their parents/caregivers in 7 participating anonymized countries completed standardized questionnaires in their own language on executive function, health status, behavior, health-related quality of life, and medical, educational, employment, and social information. Pre- and postoperative neurologic status and serial heights and weights were also recorded. Results: Data were provided by 151 of 244 eligible survivors (62%) at a median age at assessment of 15.2 years and median interval from diagnosis of 5.8 years. Compared with standard radiation therapy, hyperfractionated radiation therapy was associated with lower (ie, better) z-scores for executive function in all participants (mean intergroup difference 0.48 SDs, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.81, P=.004), but health status, behavioral difficulties, and health-related quality of life z-scores were similar in the 2 treatment arms. Data on hearing impairment were equivocal. Hyperfractionated radiation therapy was also associated with greater decrement in height z-scores (mean intergroup difference 0.43 SDs, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.76, P=.011). Conclusions: Hyperfractionated radiation therapy was associated with better executive function and worse growth but without accompanying change in health status, behavior, or quality of life

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.046

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.046;
PII
S0360-3016(13)03186-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
88
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 292-300
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45104733
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHEMOTHERAPY; CHILDREN; DIAGNOSIS; RADIOTHERAPY; STANDARD OF LIVING
Descriptors DEC
AGE GROUPS; ANIMALS; MAMMALS; MAN; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PRIMATES; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.