Published 1996
| Version v1
Book
Making bilateral competition work
Description
Two alternative arrangements that have been advocated to implement California's proposed institution of retail wheeling are compared. San Diego Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison proposed the development of a centralized power pool (as in the United Kingdom) that would act as a spot market for buying and selling power. By contrast, Pacific Gas and Electric and Enron Power Marketing support individual contracts between suppliers and customers with centralized operator dispatch. The basic functional elements of two transmission systems that could support direct access are reviewed. 4 figs., 11 tabs., 10 refs
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Imprint Place
- Dordrecht (Netherlands)
- ISBN
- 0-7923-9643-X
- Imprint Title
- Electricity transmission pricing and technology
- Imprint Pagination
- 290 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 103-127.
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- Netherlands
- INIS RN
- 28050895
- Subject category
- S24: POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION;
- Descriptors DEI
- BILATERAL AGREEMENTS; COMPETITION; CONTRACTS; DEREGULATION; ELECTRIC POWER; INTERCONNECTED POWER SYSTEMS; POWER TRANSMISSION; PRICES; PRICING REGULATIONS; PUBLIC UTILITIES; RETAIL PRICES; SPOT MARKET; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; USA
- Descriptors DEC
- AGREEMENTS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS; LAWS; MARKET; NORTH AMERICA; POWER; POWER SYSTEMS; REGULATIONS