Energy and greenhouse gas balances of cassava-based ethanol
- 1. Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen (Netherlands)
- 2. Agricultural and Food Economics Group, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Steig 22, 85354 Freising (Germany)
Description
Biofuel production has been promoted to save fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, there have been concerns about the potential of biofuel to improve energy efficiency and mitigate climate change. This paper investigates energy efficiency and GHG emission saving of cassava-based ethanol as energy for transportation. Energy and GHG balances are calculated for a functional unit of 1 km of road transportation using life-cycle assessment and considering effects of land use change (LUC). Based on a case study in Vietnam, the results show that the energy input for and GHG emissions from ethanol production are 0.93 MJ and 34.95 g carbon dioxide equivalent per megajoule of ethanol respectively. The use of E5 and E10 as a substitute for gasoline results in energy savings, provided that their fuel consumption in terms of liter per kilometer of transportation is not exceeding the consumption of gasoline per kilometer by more than 2.4% and 4.5% respectively. It will reduce GHG emissions, provided that the fuel consumption of E5 and E10 is not exceeding the consumption of gasoline per kilometer by more than 3.8% and 7.8% respectively. The quantitative effects depend on the efficiency in production and on the fuel efficiency of E5 and E10. The variations in results of energy input and GHG emissions in the ethanol production among studies are due to differences in coverage of effects of LUC, CO2 photosynthesis of cassava, yields of cassava, energy efficiency in farming, and by-product analyses. -- Highlights: ► Cassava-based ethanol substitution for gasoline in form of E5 could save 1.4 MJ km−1 ► Ethanol substitution for gasoline in form of E5 reduces a CO2e emission of 156 g km−1 ► We examined changes in fuel efficiency of blends affecting energy and GHG balances. ► LUC and change in soil management lead to a CO2e emission of 942 g L−1 of ethanol. ► LUC effects, energy inputs, yields, and by-products explain results among studies
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.011Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.011;
- PII
- S0961-9534(13)00026-3;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Journal Volume
- 51
- Journal Page Range
- p. 125-135
- ISSN
- 0961-9534
- CODEN
- BMSBEO
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 45042740
- Subject category
- S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOFUELS; BY-PRODUCTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CASSAVA; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ETHANOL; FARMS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE GASES; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SOILS; VIET NAM
- Descriptors DEC
- ALCOHOLS; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ASIA; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EFFICIENCY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY SOURCES; FUELS; HYDROXY COMPOUNDS; LIQUID FUELS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPSIDA; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; PLANTS; SYNTHESIS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.