Published February 2000
| Version v1
Journal article
γ-ray spectrometry results versus sample preparation methods
Creators
- 1. Ministry of Public Health, Beijing (China). Laboratory of Industrial Hygiene
- 2. Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China). Laboratory of Low Background Compton Suppression (γ)-ray Spectrometer, The Dept. of Engineering Physics
Description
According to recommended conditions two bio-samples, tea leave and flour, are prepared with different methods: grounding into powder and reducing to ash, then they were analyzed by γ ray spectrometry. Remarkable difference was shown between the measured values of tea samples prepared with these different methods. One of the reasons may be that the method of reducing to ash makes some nuclides lost. Compared with the 'non-destructive' method of grounding into powder, the method of reducing to ash can be much more sensible to the loss of some nuclides. The probable reasons are discussed for the varied influences of different preparation methods of tea leave and flour samples
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Science and Techniques
- Journal Volume
- 11
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 60-64
- ISSN
- 1001-8042
INIS
- Country of Publication
- China
- Country of Input or Organization
- China
- INIS RN
- 31041020
- Subject category
- S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; ASHES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ERRORS; FLOUR; GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY; LOSSES; POWDERS; RADIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; SAMPLE PREPARATION; TEA LEAVES
- Descriptors DEC
- CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMBUSTION PRODUCTS; EVALUATION; FOOD; LEAVES; QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; RESIDUES; SPECTROSCOPY