Published February 15, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Mechanical characteristics of Fe-based coating obtained by nanoindentation

  • 1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130 (China) and National Key Lab for Remanufacturing, Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, Beijing 100072 (China)
  • 2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130 (China)
  • 3. National Key Lab for Remanufacturing, Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, Beijing 100072 (China)

Description

Research highlights: → AFM combined with O and P method was put forward to investigate materials of pile-up. → Properties obtained by G and S and new proposed methods showed the same distribution. → Both hardness and elastic modulus showed certain surface roughness dependence. → Elastic modulus obtained by AFM combined with O and P method was insensitive to RMS. - Abstract: In this study, clad layers of iron-based alloy with a nature of self-fluxing were melted on low carbon steel by plasma cladding process. Nanoindentation with atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to investigate the mechanical properties of the coating. Hardness and elastic modulus at ultra-low loads were first determined using the method proposed by Giannakopoulos and Suresh (G and S method). The true contact area and mechanical properties were then determined using atomic force microscopy (AFM) combined with the Oliver and Pharr method (new proposed method) as the correction group. The mechanical properties calculated by the two methods showed the same distribution while had deviation in specific values. The effect of surface roughness to the calculated mechanical properties was investigated. Both hardness and elastic modulus were found to exhibit certain surface roughness dependence. When root mean square (RMS) roughness ranged from 2.2 nm to 4.4 nm, hardness calculated by both the methods increased obviously and reached maximums around 4.1 nm. Elastic modulus calculated by G and S method at different RMS showed the same distribution with that of hardness, while reduced elastic modulus obtained by AFM was insensitive to the range of RMS.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.030

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.030;
PII
S0169-4332(10)01758-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Surface Science
Journal Volume
257
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 4246-4249
ISSN
0169-4332
CODEN
ASUSEE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.