Accuracy of thin-slice model-based iterative reconstruction designed for brain CT to diagnose acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory. A multicenter study
Creators
- 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, 734-8551, Hiroshima (Japan)
- 2. Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
- 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1, Kabeminami, Asakita-ku, 731-0293, Hiroshima (Japan)
- 4. Department of Radiology, Shin Koga Hospital, 120, Tenjinmachi, 830-8577, Kurume, Fukuoka (Japan)
- 5. Department of Radiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health School of Medicine, 807-8555, 1-1, Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka (Japan)
Description
Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) yields higher spatial resolution and a lower image noise than conventional reconstruction methods. We hypothesized that thin-slice MBIR designed for brain CT could improve the detectability of acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. Included were 41 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the MCA territory; they were seen at 4 medical centers. The controls were 39 subjects without acute stroke. Images were reconstructed with hybrid IR and with MBIR designed for brain CT at slice thickness of 2 mm. We measured the image noise in the ventricle and compared the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the ischemic lesion. We analyzed the ability of reconstructed images to detect ischemic lesions using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis; 8 observers read the routine clinical hybrid IR with 5 mm-thick images, while referring to 2 mm-thick hybrid IR images or MBIR images. The image noise was significantly lower on MBIR- than hybrid IR images (1.2 vs. 3.4, p < 0.001). The CNR was significantly higher with MBIR than hybrid IR (6.3 vs. 1.6, p < 0.001). The mean area under the ROC curve was also significantly higher on hybrid IR plus MBIR than hybrid IR (0.55 vs. 0.48, p < 0.036). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 41.2%, 88.8%, and 65.7%, respectively, for hybrid IR; they were 58.8%, 86.1%, and 72.9%, respectively, for hybrid IR plus MBIR. The additional thin-slice MBIR designed for brain CT may improve the detection of acute MCA stroke.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02745-4Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Neuroradiology
- Journal Volume
- 63
- Journal Issue
- 12
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2013-2021
- ISSN
- 0028-3940
- CODEN
- NRDYAB
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 53018023
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; BRAIN; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; ISCHEMIA; ITERATIVE METHODS; SENSITIVITY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPECIFICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- ANEMIAS; ARTERIES; BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; HEMIC DISEASES; NERVOUS SYSTEM; ORGANS; PROCESSING; RESOLUTION; SYMPTOMS; TOMOGRAPHY; VASCULAR DISEASES