There is a newer version of the record available.

Published May 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Incorporating social dimensions in hydrological and water quality modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural beneficial management practices in a Prairie River Basin

  • 1. University of Saskatchewan. School of Environment and Sustainability (Canada)
  • 2. Polytechnique Montreal. Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering (Canada)
  • 3. University of Saskatchewan. Department of Geography and Planning (Canada)

Description

There is growing interest to develop processes for creating user-informed watershed scale models of hydrology and water quality and to assist in decision-making for balanced policies for managing watersheds. Watershed models can be enhanced with the incorporation of social dimensions of watershed management as brought forward by participants such as the perspectives, values, and norms of people that depend on the land, water, and ecosystems for sustenance, economies, and overall wellbeing. In this work, we explore the value of combining both qualitative and quantitative methods and social science data to enhance salience and legitimacy of watershed models so that end-users are more engaged. We discuss pilot testing and engagement workshops for building and testing a systems dynamics model of the Qu'Appelle Valley to gather insights from local farmers and understand their perceptions of Beneficial Management Practices (BMPs). Mixed-method workshops with agricultural producers in the Qu'Appelle Watershed gathered feedback on the developing model and the incorporation of social determinants affecting decision-making. Analysis of focus groups and factor analysis of Q-sorts were used to identify the desired components of the model, and whether it supported farmers' understanding of the potential effects of BMPs on water quality. We explored farmers' engagement with models testing BMPs and the potential of incorporating their decision processes within the model itself. Finally, we discuss the reception of the process and the practicality of the approach in providing legitimate and credible decision support tools for a community of farmers.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
13
Journal Page Range
p. 14271-14287
ISSN
0944-1344
CODEN
ESPLEC

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55079533
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
DECISION MAKING; ECONOMY; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FEEDBACK; FLOOD CONTROL; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE; MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC OPINION; SIMULATION; TESTING; TOOLS; VALLEYS; WATER QUALITY
Descriptors DEC
CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; EQUIPMENT; GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019