Published May 1981 | Version v1
Journal article

Pitfalls in current design requirements

Creators

  • 1. Babcock and Wilcox, Lynchburg, VA

Description

It is illogical to continue using some current design requirements in their present form. Specifying design criteria to guard against various occurrences while neglecting an examination of their likelihood is unjustifiable. Probabilistic analyses, followed if necessary by cost-benefit analyses, can focus on and bring into perspective various adverse implications resulting from some deterministic criteria and requirements. Proper use and probabilistic analysis techniques will give system designers latitude in design decisions, thereby eliminating the built-in biases of design philosophy based on deterministic criteria. This resultant philosophical diversity applied to attaining design goals should be beneficial in reducing risks from nuclear stations

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nucl. Saf.
Journal Volume
22
Journal Issue
3
Series
Nucl. Saf.
Journal Page Range
328-336
ISSN
0029-5604

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
13671640
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATIONS
Descriptors DEC
NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS