Published 2024 | Version v1
Journal article

Improved Resolution and Image Quality of Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging using Deep Learning-based Denoising Reconstruction. A Prospective Clinical Study

  • 1. Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc., 2441 Michelle Drive, 92780, Tustin, CA (United States)
  • 2. Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Dr, 81657, Vail, CO (United States)
  • 3. The Steadman Clinic, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 400, 81657, Vail, CO (United States)
  • 4. Stanford University, 450 Jane Stanford Way, 94305-2004, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 5. University of Southern California, 3551 Trousdale Pkwy, 90089, Los Angeles, CA (United States)

Description

To prospectively evaluate a deep learning-based denoising reconstruction (DLR) for improved resolution and image quality in musculoskeletal (MSK) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Images from 137 contrast-weighted sequences in 40 MSK patients were evaluated. Each sequence was performed twice, first with the routine parameters and reconstructed with a routine reconstruction filter (REF), then with higher resolution and reconstructed with DLR, and with three conventional reconstruction filters (NL2, GA43, GA53). The five reconstructions (REF, DLR, NL2, GA43, and GA53) were de-identified, randomized, and blindly reviewed by three MSK radiologists using eight scoring criteria and a forced ranking. Quantitative SNR, CNR, and structure's full width at half maximum (FWHM) for resolution assessment were measured and compared. To account for repeated measures, Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with Bonferroni adjustment was used to compare the reader's scores, SNR, CNR, and FWHM between DLR vs. NL2, GA43, GA53, and REF. Compared to the routine REF images, the resolution was improved by 47.61% with DLR from 0.39 ± 0.15 mm2 to 0.20 ± 0.06 mm2 (p < 0.001). Per-sequence average scan time was shortened by 7.93% with DLR from 165.58 ± 21.86 s to 152.45 ± 25.65 s (p < 0.001). Based on the average scores, DLR images were rated significantly higher in all image quality criteria and the forced ranking (p < 0.001). This prospective clinical evaluation demonstrated that DLR allows approximately two times finer resolution and improved image quality compared to the standard-of-care images.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
53
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 2585-2596
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI