Published September 30, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data

  • 1. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop M888, Los Alamos, NM 87507 (United States)
  • 2. Global Phasing Ltd, Sheraton House, Castle Park, Cambridge CB3 0AX (United Kingdom)

Description

Macromolecular structures deposited in the PDB can and should be continually reinterpreted and improved on the basis of their accompanying experimental X-ray data, exploiting the steady progress in methods and software that the deposition of such data into the PDB on a massive scale has made possible. Accurate crystal structures of macromolecules are of high importance in the biological and biomedical fields. Models of crystal structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are in general of very high quality as deposited. However, methods for obtaining the best model of a macromolecular structure from a given set of experimental X-ray data continue to progress at a rapid pace, making it possible to improve most PDB entries after their deposition by re-analyzing the original deposited data with more recent software. This possibility represents a very significant departure from the situation that prevailed when the PDB was created, when it was envisioned as a cumulative repository of static contents. A radical paradigm shift for the PDB is therefore proposed, away from the static archive model towards a much more dynamic body of continuously improving results in symbiosis with continuously improving methods and software. These simultaneous improvements in methods and final results are made possible by the current deposition of processed crystallographic data (structure-factor amplitudes) and will be supported further by the deposition of raw data (diffraction images). It is argued that it is both desirable and feasible to carry out small-scale and large-scale efforts to make this paradigm shift a reality. Small-scale efforts would focus on optimizing structures that are of interest to specific investigators. Large-scale efforts would undertake a systematic re-optimization of all of the structures in the PDB, or alternatively the redetermination of groups of structures that are either related to or focused on specific questions. All of the resulting structures should be made generally available, along with the precursor entries, with various views of the structures being made available depending on the types of questions that users are interested in answering

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714017040; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188001

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Acta Crystallographica. Section D: Biological Crystallography
Journal Volume
70
Journal Issue
Pt 10
Journal Page Range
p. 2533-2543
ISSN
0907-4449
CODEN
ABCRE6

INIS

Country of Publication
Denmark
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46054090
Subject category
S75: CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Numerical Data
Descriptors DEI
AMPLITUDES; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALS; CURRENTS; DATA ANALYSIS; DEPOSITION; DIFFRACTION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; IMAGES; OPTIMIZATION; PRECURSOR; PROTEINS; RADICALS; STRUCTURE FACTORS
Descriptors DEC
COHERENT SCATTERING; DATA; DATA PROCESSING; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; INFORMATION; NUMERICAL DATA; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PROCESSING; SCATTERING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) Terwilliger & Bricogne 2014
Notes
PMCID: PMC4188001; PMID: 25286839; PUBLISHER-ID: dz5335; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4188001; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.