Published 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Clinical Study The Influence of Effective Energy on Computed Tomography Number Depends on Tissue Characteristics in Monoenergetic Cardiac Imaging

  • 1. First Department of Internal Medicine, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522 (Japan)

Description

Purpose. To evaluate the influence of effective energy on computed tomography (CT) number in monoenergetic images (MEIs). Methods. Three bottle phantoms filled with water, oil, and a contrast agent were scanned at 100 and 140 kVp tube energy with a dual-source CT scanner. Cardiac dual-energy CT data was collected from 17 patients. CT numbers were measured in the 3 phantom materials and in the left ventricular cavity, myocardium, pericardial fat, and vertebral bone in MEIs from 40 to 190 keV. Results. In the phantoms, the mean CT number increased in oil whereas it decreased in the contrast agent as the energy level increased (Ρ < 0 . 0 0 1 ). In clinical subjects, the mean CT numbers for the left ventricular cavity, myocardium, and vertebral bone were highest in the 40 keV images ( Ρ < 0 . 0 0 1 ) and decreased as the energy level increased. In contrast, the CT number for pericardial fat was lowest in the 40 keV images (Ρ < 0 . 0 0 1 ) and increased with increasing energy. Conclusions. The influence of effective energy on CT number varies with material and tissue type in monoenergetic cardiac imaging, which could evaluate tissue characteristics through assessment of the changes in CT number associated with effective energies

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiology Research and Practice (Online)
Journal Volume
2012
Journal Issue
2012
Journal Page Range
p. 7
ISSN
2090-195X

INIS

Country of Publication
Egypt
Country of Input or Organization
Egypt
INIS RN
46098403
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARDIOGRAPHY; CAT SCANNING; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ENERGY; PATIENTS; PHANTOMS
Descriptors DEC
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; MOCKUP; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY