Published June 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Do announcements of WTO dispute resolution cases matter? Evidence from the rare earth elements market

  • 1. Concordia University, John Molson School of Business Building, 1450 Guy, Montreal, Quebec H3H 0A1 (Canada)
  • 2. Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, International Business School Suzhou (IBSS), No 111 Ren'ai Road, Suzhou Dushu Lake Higher Education Town, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province 215123 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Rare earth elements (REEs) are important for green- and high-technology products. • Announcements of WTO dispute resolution cases have the power to change market dynamics. • The price-generating process of REEs changes after the announcement. • Stock price informativeness of companies in the REEs industry increases after the announcement. • Model uncertainty for option pricing models decreases after the announcement. - Abstract: Rare earth elements (REEs) have gained increasing attention recently for several key reasons: 1) they are vital to many strategic industries, 2) they are relatively scarce, 3) they frequently exhibit high price fluctuations, 4) China holds a quasi-monopoly on their mining, and 5) China's REE policy, which was overly restrictive and led to a formal complaint from the U.S., Japan, and the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2012. This paper investigates whether the announcement of a WTO dispute resolution case has the power to fundamentally change market dynamics. We find empirical support for this notion because REE prices exhibit a structural break around the announcement of the WTO dispute, and show lower variance ratios for all tested REEs afterward. This indicates a tendency toward efficiency, although REE prices still do not follow a random walk. Similarly, we find that stock price informativeness of companies in the REE industry increases after the announcement, reflecting more firm-specific than marketwide information and less governmental influence. Finally, we show that model uncertainty for option pricing models decreases, which we measure by the lower pricing differences among them.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.004;
PII
S0140988318301713;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
73
Journal Page Range
p. 1-23
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50034977
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CHINA; ECONOMIC POLICY; EFFICIENCY; GLOBAL ASPECTS; GRAPH THEORY; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION; JAPAN; MARKET; MINING; MONOPOLIES; PRICES; RARE EARTHS; TRADE
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MATHEMATICS; METALS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.