Published October 2003 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: A comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems

  • 1. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Radiological Sciences, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095 (United States)
  • 2. University of Michigan Medical School, C5124 Medical Science Building I, 1301 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 (United States)

Description

Digital detectors in mammography have wide dynamic range in addition to the benefit of decoupled acquisition and display. How wide the dynamic range is and how it compares to film-screen systems in the clinical x-ray exposure domain are unclear. In this work, we compare the effective dynamic ranges of film-screen and flat panel mammography systems, along with the dynamic ranges of their component image receptors in the clinical x-ray exposure domain. An ACR mammography phantom was imaged using variable mAs (exposure) values for both systems. The dynamic range of the contrast-limited film-screen system was defined as that ratio of mAs (exposure) values for a 26 kVp Mo/Mo (HVL=0.34 mm Al) beam that yielded passing phantom scores. The same approach was done for the noise-limited digital system. Data from three independent observers delineated a useful phantom background optical density range of 1.27 to 2.63, which corresponded to a dynamic range of 2.3±0.53. The digital system had a dynamic range of 9.9±1.8, which was wider than the film-screen system (p<0.02). The dynamic range of the film-screen system was limited by the dynamic range of the film. The digital detector, on the other hand, had an estimated dynamic range of 42, which was wider than the dynamic range of the digital system in its entirety by a factor of 4. The generator/tube combination was the limiting factor in determining the digital system's dynamic range

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Physics
Journal Volume
30
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 2614-2621
ISSN
0094-2405
CODEN
MPHYA6

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.