Published March 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Optimum size of a calibration phantom for x-ray CT to convert the Hounsfield units to stopping power ratios in charged particle therapy treatment planning

  • 1. Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555 (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555 (Japan)
  • 3. Medical Physics Section, National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555 (Japan)

Description

In charged-particle therapy treatment planning, the volumetric distribution of stopping power ratios (SPRs) of body tissues relative to water is used for patient dose calculation. The distribution is conventionally obtained from computed tomography (CT) images of a patient using predetermined conversion functions from the CT numbers to the SPRs. One of the biggest uncertainty sources of patient SPR estimation is insufficient correction of beam hardening arising from the mismatch between the size of the patient cross section and the calibration phantom for producing the conversion functions. The uncertainty would be minimized by selecting a suitable size for the cylindrical water calibration phantom, referred to as an 'effective size' of the patient cross section, Leffective. We investigated the Leffective for pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head and neck regions by simulating an ideal CT system using volumetric models of the reference male and female phantoms. The Leffective values were 23.3, 20.3, 22.7 and 18.8 cm for the pelvis, abdomen, thorax, and head and neck regions, respectively, and the Leffective for whole body was 21.0 cm. Using the conversion function for a 21.0-cm-diameter cylindrical water phantom, we could reduce the root mean square deviation of the SPRs and their mean deviation to ≤0.011 and ≤0.001, respectively, in the whole body. Accordingly, for simplicity, the effective size of 21.0 cm can be used for the whole body, irrespective of body-part regions for treatment planning in clinical practice.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx059; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951078

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Radiation Research
Journal Volume
59
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 216-224
ISSN
0449-3060

INIS

Country of Publication
Japan
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49082982
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CALIBRATION; CHARGED PARTICLES; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENTS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; STOPPING POWER; THERAPY; X RADIATION
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; RADIATIONS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Notes
PMCID: PMC5951078; PMID: 29095996; PMID: 29095996; PUBLISHER-ID: rrx059; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:5951078