Published October 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

2D axial-azimuthal particle-in-cell benchmark for low-temperature partially magnetized plasmas

  • 1. Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas, CNRS, Ecole polytechnique, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Sud, Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris-Saclay, PSL Research University, F-91128 Palaiseau (France)
  • 2. LAPLACE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, F-31062 Toulouse (France)
  • 3. RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, CO 80301 (United States)
  • 4. CERFACS—42, avenue Gaspard Coriolis, F-31057 Toulouse (France)
  • 5. Ruhr University Bochum, Universitaetsstrasse 150, D-44801 Bochum (Germany)
  • 6. Texas A and M University, College Station, TX 77843 (United States)
  • 7. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08540 (United States)
  • 8. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (United States)
  • 9. Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan, 116 Science Place, Saskatoon SK S7N 5E2 (Canada)

Description

The increasing need to demonstrate the correctness of computer simulations has highlighted the importance of benchmarks. We define in this paper a representative simulation case to study low-temperature partially-magnetized plasmas. Seven independently developed particle-in-cell codes have simulated this benchmark case, with the same specified conditions. The characteristics of the codes used, such as implementation details or computing times and resources, are given. First, we compare at steady-state the time-averaged axial profiles of three main discharge parameters (axial electric field, ion density and electron temperature). We show that the results obtained exhibit a very good agreement within 5% between all the codes. As E × B discharges are known to cause instabilities propagating in the direction of electron drift, an analysis of these instabilities is then performed and a similar behaviour is retrieved between all the codes. A particular attention has been paid to the numerical convergence by varying the number of macroparticles per cell and we show that the chosen benchmark case displays a good convergence. Detailed outputs are given in the supplementary data, to be used by other similar codes in the perspective of code verification. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ab46c5

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Journal Volume
28
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
[17 p.]
ISSN
0963-0252

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54021231
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
BENCHMARKS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRON DRIFT; ELECTRON TEMPERATURE; ION DENSITY; PLASMA; STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS
Descriptors DEC
SIMULATION