Published October 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of a data fusion approach to estimate daily PM2.5 levels in North China

  • 1. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191 (China)
  • 3. Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 (United States)

Description

PM2.5 air pollution has been a growing concern worldwide. Previous studies have conducted several techniques to estimate PM2.5 exposure spatiotemporally in China, but all these have limitations. This study was to develop a data fusion approach and compare it with kriging and Chemistry Module. Two techniques were applied to create daily spatial cover of PM2.5 in grid cells with a resolution of 10 km in North China in 2013, respectively, which was kriging with an external drift (KED) and Weather Research and Forecast Model with Chemistry Module (WRF-Chem). A data fusion technique was developed by fusing PM2.5 concentration predicted by KED and WRF-Chem, accounting for the distance from the central of grid cell to the nearest ground observations and daily spatial correlations between WRF-Chem and observations. Model performances were evaluated by comparing them with ground observations and the spatial prediction errors. KED and data fusion performed better at monitoring sites with a daily model R2 of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively and PM2.5 was overestimated by WRF-Chem (R2=0.51). KED and data fusion performed better around the ground monitors, WRF-Chem performed relative worse with high prediction errors in the central of study domain. In our study, both KED and data fusion technique provided highly accurate PM2.5. Current monitoring network in North China was dense enough to provide a reliable PM2.5 prediction by interpolation technique. - Highlights: • KED and data fusion model predicted daily PM2.5 with high accuracy. • WRF-Chem performed worse in PM2.5 prediction compared with KED and data fusion. • The PM2.5 monitoring network in North China was able to support reliable PM2.5 interpolation.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.001

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.001;
PII
S0013-9351(17)31060-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research
Journal Volume
158
Journal Page Range
p. 54-60
ISSN
0013-9351
CODEN
ENVRAL

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49057908
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
AIR POLLUTION MONITORING; CHINA; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; FORECASTING; MONITORS; PERFORMANCE
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; EVALUATION; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MONITORING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.