Published April 1998
| Version v1
Journal article
Comparison of evaluation of vascular with CT angiography and MR angiography
Creators
- 1. Kumamoto Univ. (Japan). School of Medicine
Description
To assess the value of CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of aortic, peripheral arterial and portal venous disease, we retrospectively evaluated 136 patients (85 males and 51 females, age range: 9-83 years old). In both modalities, 3D imaging could be obtained. For aortic diseases and renal artery diseases, CT angiography provided better information than MR angiography. For peripheral arterial diseases and portal venous diseases, MR angiography was better. In both modalities, more detailed information could be obtained with axial images. (author)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nippon Kekkan Geka Gakkai Zasshi
- Journal Volume
- 7
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 491-501
- ISSN
- 0918-6778
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Japan
- Country of Input or Organization
- Japan
- INIS RN
- 29043117
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; AORTA; CAT SCANNING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DTPA; GADOLINIUM COMPLEXES; NMR IMAGING; PORTAL SYSTEM; THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS; THROMBOSIS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- AMINO ACIDS; ARTERIES; BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CHELATING AGENTS; COMPLEXES; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DRUGS; EVALUATION; ORGANIC ACIDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; RADIOPROTECTIVE SUBSTANCES; RARE EARTH COMPLEXES; RESPONSE MODIFYING FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY; VEINS