Published May 13, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Determination of trace elements in lithium niobate crystals by solid sampling and solution-based spectrometry methods

  • 1. Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 49, H-1525 Budapest (Hungary)
  • 2. Institute for Atomic Energy Research, Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 49, H-1525 Budapest (Hungary)
  • 3. Department of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Loránd Eötvös University, P.O. Box 32, H-1518 Budapest (Hungary)
  • 4. Institute of Food Science, University of West Hungary, H-9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Lucsony u. 15-17 (Hungary)
  • 5. Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority, H-1136 Budapest, Fényes Adolf u. 4 (Hungary)
  • 6. Institute for Isotope Research, Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 49, H-1525 Budapest (Hungary)

Description

Highlights: ► Solid sampling GFAAS was studied for Cr, Fe and Mn determination in lithium niobate. ► Solution based GFAAS, FAAS, ICP-OES and ICP-MS were elaborated for method validation. ► The performances of the elaborated spectrochemical methods have been compared. ► The chemical forms of the matrix produced in GFAAS cycles were studied by XANES. - Abstract: Solid sampling (SS) graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) and solution-based (SB) methods of GFAAS, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were elaborated and/or optimized for the determination of Cr, Fe and Mn trace elements used as dopants in lithium niobate optical crystals. The calibration of the SS-GFAAS analysis was possible with the application of the three-point-estimation standard addition method, while the SB methods were mostly calibrated against matrix-matched and/or acidic standards. Spectral and non-spectral interferences were studied in SB-GFAAS after digestion of the samples. The SS-GFAAS method required the use of less sensitive spectral lines of the analytes and a higher internal furnace gas (Ar) flow rate to decrease the sensitivity for crystal samples of higher (doped) analyte content. The chemical forms of the matrix produced at various stages of the graphite furnace heating cycle, dispensed either as a solid sample or a solution (after digestion), were studied by means of the X-ray near-edge absorption structure (XANES). These results revealed that the solid matrix vaporized/deposited in the graphite furnace is mostly present in the metallic form, while the dry residue from the solution form mostly vaporized/deposited as the oxide of niobium.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.03.013

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2012.03.013;
PII
S0003-2670(12)00378-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Analytica Chimica Acta
Journal Volume
726
Journal Page Range
p. 1-8
ISSN
0003-2670
CODEN
ACACAM

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.