Published November 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Do governments track the implementation of national climate change adaptation plans? An evidence-based global stocktake of monitoring and evaluation systems

Creators

  • 1. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • More than 60% of countries that adopted a national adaptation plan (NAP) are not tracking its implementation. • 23 countries have published a NAP implementation report and 15 have undertaken a NAP evaluation, almost twice as many as 2017. • Almost 40% of countries reporting on NAP implementation are developing countries but only three are Least Developed Countries. • The number of countries engaged in developing or using mechanisms to track NAP implementation has increased by 40% since 2017. • NAP M&E systems support reporting on adaptation progress under the Global Stocktake of the Paris Agreement. Although over 70 countries adopted a national climate change adaptation plan (NAP), little is known about the extent to which these plans are implemented. NAP monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems can play an important role in tracking implementation but have rarely been studied. Based on a systematic review including outreach to country representatives and international organizations, a comprehensive inventory of NAP M&E systems is compiled documenting government practices from over 60 countries. In contrast to previous studies, this stocktake does not rely on stated intentions of M&E but requires evidence such as monitoring and evaluation reports. The extent of NAP M&E involvement globally and countries' respective status are determined and compared to a baseline from the 2017 Adaptation Gap Report of the United Nations Environment Programme. Results show a 40% increase in the number of countries that are developing or using NAP M&E systems and almost a doubling of published NAP evaluations. However, over 60% of countries that adopted a NAP do not systematically assess its implementation, leaving a critical gap in understanding the impacts of NAPs. These findings support calls for greater attention to the quality of adaptation planning and for assessing its implementation and effectiveness.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.017

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.017;
PII
S1462901121002379;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Science and Policy
Journal Volume
125
Journal Page Range
p. 179-188
ISSN
1462-9011

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54001082
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
CLIMATIC CHANGE; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PARIS AGREEMENT; PLANNING; REVIEWS; UNITED NATIONS
Descriptors DEC
AGREEMENTS; DOCUMENT TYPES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.