Costs and potentials of energy conservation in China's coal-fired power industry: A bottom-up approach considering price uncertainties
Creators
- 1. Energy Policy Research Group (EPRG), Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1AG (United Kingdom)
- 2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing, Beijing 100081 (China)
- 3. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
- 4. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 (China)
Description
Energy conservation technologies in the coal-fired power sector are important solutions for the environmental pollution and climate change issues. However, a unified framework for estimating their costs and potentials is still needed due to the wide technology choices, especially considering their economic feasibility under fuel and carbon price uncertainties. Therefore, this study has employed a bottom-up approach to analyze the costs and potentials of 32 key technologies' new promotions during the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016–2020), which combines the conservation supply curve (CSC) approach and break-even analysis. Findings show that (1) these 32 technologies have a total coal conservation potential of 275.77 Mt with a cost of 238.82 billion yuan, and their break-even coal price is 866 yuan/ton. (2) steam-water circulation system has the largest energy conservation potential in the coal-fired power industry. (3) considering the co-benefits will facilitate these technologies' promotions, because their break-even coal prices will decrease by 2.35 yuan/ton when the carbon prices increase by 1 yuan/ton. (4) discount rates have the largest impacts on the technologies' cost-effectiveness, while the future generation level affect their energy conservation potentials most. - Highlights: • The 32 technologies can save 275.77 Mt coal with a cost of 238.82 billion yuan. • The steam-water circulation system has the largest energy conservation potential. • Considering the co-benefits will facilitate the technology promotions • Discount rates have the largest impacts on the technologies' cost-effectiveness.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.022Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.022;
- PII
- S0301-4215(17)30033-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 104
- Journal Page Range
- p. 23-32
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48086406
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AVAILABILITY; CARBON; CHINA; CLIMATES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; COAL; COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGRAMS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; INTEREST RATE; NATIONAL ENERGY PLANS; POLLUTION; PRICES; STEAM; WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; INFORMATION; MATERIALS; NONMETALS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.