A comparison of the radiological impact of energy production by fission and fusion reactions
Description
The impacts of respectively a light water reactor and a planned fusion reactor, for which tritium-deuterium fusion reactions will act as energy source have been compared. The comparison is made on the basis of a generated capacity of 1 GWe.year, using the following criteria: fuel inventories, radioactive releases, collective effective dose equivalent commitments to the public and the volume of wastes. The accidental risk is not introduced. Fusion reactor parameters are still subject to uncertainties, which prevent accurate quantification of radionuclide releases (tritium apart) from the nuclear plant. Only orders of magnitude extrapolated from values for the NET tokamak are given. Despite these uncertainties, it would seem more interesting, from the dosimetric point of view, to use fusion reactors to produce electricity, although problems of radioactive releases, handling and long-term storage of radioactive waste would remain. Fusion reactors also generate generate high-level wastes with long-term exposure rates that are lower than those of light water reactors
Availability note (English)
MF available from INIS under the Report Number.Abstract (French)
Ce rapport compare l'impact de l'ensemble du cycle combustible nucleaire correspondant aux reacteurs a eau legere avec celui de l'ensemble du cycle du combustible associe au futur reacteur de fusion, utilisant comme source d'energie des reactions de fusion tritium-deuterium. La comparaison a ete faite sur une base de production d'energie de 1 GWe.an. Les criteres de comparaison choisis ont ete les inventaires de produits combustibles manipules, les rejets radioactifs effectues sur l'ensemble des installations, les engagements d'equivalents de dose efficace delivres a la population et le volume des dechets; le risque accidentel n'a pas ete pris en compte. Pour les reacteurs de fusion quelques incertitudes resident encore qui ne permettent pas de connaitre precisement la quantite de produits autres que le tritium rejete au niveau du reacteur. Seuls des ordres de grandeurs extrapoles du Tokamak NET sont donnes. Malgre ces incertitudes, il semblerait plus economique au plan dosimetrique de produire de l'electricite par des reacteurs de fusion, bien que cette filiere ne supprime pas tous les problemes relatifs aux rejets, a la manipulation et au stockage a plus ou moins long terme de produits radioactifs. Cette filiere conduit aussi a des dechets de haute activite dont les debits d'irradiation sont cependant plus faibles a long terme que ceux de la filiere des reacteurs a eau pressuriseeFiles
22028772.pdf
Files
(1.5 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:47b0d06343e8e482bdcf5c6b14df8262
|
1.5 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Original title (French)
- Comparaison de l'impact radiologique de la production d'energie par des reactions de fusion et des reactions de fission
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 75 p.
- Report number
- CEA-R--5528
INIS
- Country of Publication
- France
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 22028772
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DOSE COMMITMENTS; DOSE EQUIVALENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FUEL CYCLE; GASEOUS WASTES; HUMAN POPULATIONS; LIQUID WASTES; NUCLEAR FUEL CONVERSION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; REPROCESSING; RISK ASSESSMENT; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TRITIUM
- Descriptors DEC
- BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; EVALUATION; HYDROGEN ISOTOPES; ISOTOPES; LIGHT NUCLEI; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; NUCLEI; ODD-EVEN NUCLEI; POPULATIONS; POWER REACTORS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; RADIOISOTOPES; REACTORS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; STORAGE; THERMAL REACTORS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE STORAGE; WASTES; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS; YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES