SU-F-J-209: Quantification of Image-Guidance Benefit in Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Cancers
Creators
- 1. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT (United States)
- 2. Division of Radiation Physics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu (China)
Description
Purpose: Image-guidance has been widely used in radiation oncology for accurate radiotherapy. The goal of this study is to quantify the benefit of image-guidance in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of cancers. Methods: In this study, a new index termed image-guidance benefit (IGB), was proposed to quantify the benefit of image-guidance in cancer radiotherapy. It is calculated as a ratio of the square sum of dose differences between planning dose matrix and actual delivery dose matrix post image-guidance to the square sum of dose summation between the two matrixes, summing over all dose scoring voxels. Ranging from 0 to 1, larger IGB values indicate larger benefit out of image-guidance. With IRB approval, the DICOM RT files and 3D couch shifts applied during IGRT of 2219 patients were collected, based on which patient-specific IGB values were calculated with an in-house MATLAB code. Results: In this study, the mean IGB value was found to be 0.0398 (0.000583–0.999) with a positive correlation between IGB value and 3D couch shift vector at 0.0435 per cm (P<0.0001). With 2 mm shift as a threshold above which an image-guidance is deemed clinically necessary, the corresponding mean IGB value was 0.00457, much less than 0.0398 (P<0.001). However, the IGB values of 56 cases based on couch shifts were less than those based on 2 mm shift. Conclusion: The IGB values were patient-specific and site-dependent. Using 2 mm shifts as criterion for applying image-guidance, the applied image-guidance procedures were found clinically necessary and highly beneficial in 97.5% of cancer patients. However, image-guidance procedures were found over-used in about 2.5% of cancer patients in our current practices of IGRT, which should be avoided as they added no benefit in improving delivery accuracy while increasing cancer risk.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1118/1.4956117;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Medical Physics
- Journal Volume
- 43
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0094-2405
- CODEN
- MPHYA6
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48090832
- Subject category
- S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; CORRELATIONS; IMAGES; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY
- Descriptors DEC
- DISEASES; DOSES; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Notes
- (c) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine