Published 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

A transcriptome signature distinguished sporadic from post-radiotherapy radiation-induced sarcomas

  • 1. Universite Paris VI, UMR3244, 26 Rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 5 F-75248, (France)
  • 2. CNRS UMR3244, 26 Rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 5 F-75248, (France)
  • 3. Institut Curie, Centre de Recherche, UMR3244, 26 Rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 5 F-75248, (France)
  • 4. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique, Departement Sciences de la vie, Institut de Radiobiologie cellulaire et moleculaire, Service de Radiobiologie Experimentale et d'Innovation Technologique, Laboratoire de Cancerologie Experimentale, BP6, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex F-92265, (France)
  • 5. Department de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Curie Hopital, 26 Rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 5 F-75248, (France)
  • 6. Abteilung Molekulare und Experimentelle Chirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 10 Erlangen D-91054, (Germany)

Description

Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known risk factor for cancer. However, up to now, rigorously defined scientific criteria that could establish case-by-case the radiation-induced (RI) origin of a tumour have been lacking. To identify genes that could constitute a RI signature, we compared the transcriptome of 12 sarcomas arising in the irradiation field of a primary tumour following radiotherapy with the transcriptome of 12 sporadic sarcomas. This learning/training set contained four leiomyosarcomas, four osteosarcomas and four angiosarcomas in each subgroup. We identified a signature of 135 genes discriminating RI from sporadic sarcomas. The robustness of this signature was tested by the blind case-by-case classification of an independent set of 36 sarcomas of various histologies. Thirty-one sarcomas were classified as RI or sporadic; it was not possible to propose an aetiology for the five others. After the code break, it was found that one sporadic sarcoma was mis-classified as RI. Thus, the signature is robust with a sensitivity of 96%, a positive and a negative predictive value of 96 and 100%, respectively and a specificity of 62%. The functions of the genes of the signature suggest that RI sarcomas were subject to chronic oxidative stress probably due to mitochondrial dysfunction. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgr064

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Carcinogenesis (New York)
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
no.6
Journal Page Range
p. 929-934
ISSN
0143-3334

Optional Information

Notes
66 refs.