Published 1995 | Version v1
Report

Credibility and trust in federal facility cleanups

Creators

  • 1. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC (United States)

Description

The most important indicator of a well-managed site cleanup effort may no longer be funding or scientific expertise. While support for federal facility cleanup has included appropriations of more than $10 billion annually, these expenditures alone are unlikely to assure progress toward environmental remediation. open-quotes Trustclose quotes is now overwhelmingly mentioned as a prerequisite for progress with site cleanup in DOE's weapons complex. In part, federal budget deficits are forcing participants to focus on factors that build consensus and lead to cost-effective cleanup actions. In some cases, the stakeholders at cleanup sites are making efforts to work cooperatively with federal agencies. A report by 40 representatives of federal agencies, tribal and state governments, associations, and others developed recommendations to create a open-quotes new era of trust and consensus-building that allows all parties to get on with the job of cleaning up federal facilities in a manner that reflects the priorities and concerns of all stakeholders.close quotes Changes are underway affecting how federal agencies work with federal and state regulators reflecting this concept of shared responsibility for conducting cleanup. This paper addresses these changes and provides examples of the successes and failures underway

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Environmental challenges: The next 20 years. Proceedings
Imprint Pagination
932 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 843.
Report number
CONF-9506115--

Conference

Title
environmental challenges - the next twenty years.
Acronym
20. National Association of Environmental Professionals annual conference and exposition
Dates
10-13 Jun 1995.
Place
Washington, DC (United States).

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
27048715
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
NUCLEAR FACILITIES; PUBLIC OPINION; REMEDIAL ACTION