Published October 21, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Geometric frustration in small colloidal clusters

  • 1. School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 (Australia)
  • 3. School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505 (Japan)

Description

We study the structure of clusters in a model colloidal system with competing interactions using Brownian dynamics simulations. A short-ranged attraction drives clustering, while a weak, long-ranged repulsion is used to model electrostatic charging in experimental systems. The former is treated with a short-ranged Morse attractive interaction, the latter with a repulsive Yukawa interaction. We consider the yield of clusters of specific structure as a function of the strength of the interactions, for clusters with m = 3,4,5,6,7,10 and 13 colloids. At sufficient strengths of the attractive interaction (around 10kBT), the average bond lifetime approaches the simulation timescale and the system becomes nonergodic. For small clusters, m≤5, where geometric frustration is not relevant, despite nonergodicity, for sufficient strengths of the attractive interaction the yield of clusters which maximize the number of bonds approaches 100%. However for m = 7 and higher, in the nonergodic regime we find a lower yield of these structures where we argue geometric frustration plays a significant role. m = 6 is a special case, where two structures, of octahedral and C2v symmetry, compete, with the latter being favoured by entropic contributions in the ergodic regime and by kinetic trapping in the nonergodic regime. We believe that our results should be valid as long as the one-component description of the interaction potential is valid. A system with competing electrostatic repulsions and van der Waals attractions may be such an example. However, in some cases, the one-component description of the interaction potential may not be appropriate.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/42/425103

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0953-8984/21/42/425103;
PII
S0953-8984(09)19278-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter
Journal Volume
21
Journal Issue
42
Journal Page Range
[11 p.]
ISSN
0953-8984
CODEN
JCOMEL

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41110978
Subject category
S75: CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY;
Descriptors DEI
BROWNIAN MOVEMENT; COLLOIDS; COULOMB FIELD; GEOMETRY; INTERACTIONS; SIMULATION; VAN DER WAALS FORCES; YIELDS; YUKAWA POTENTIAL
Descriptors DEC
DISPERSIONS; ELECTRIC FIELDS; MATHEMATICS; NUCLEAR POTENTIAL; POTENTIALS