Published 1995
| Version v1
Book
Comparative assessment of actinide - and risk - Reduction strategy by P and T versus direct disposal
Description
This paper analyzes the impact of the different fuel cycle strategies: direct disposal, conventional reprocessing and multiple recycling with Partitioning and Transmutation, on the evolution of the radiotoxicity. The potential impact is measured according to the Annual Limits of Intake for each of the TRU nuclides involved. Fuel cycle aspects of multiple recycling in fast burner reactors (reprocessing, fuel fabrication, mass and energy balances, residual activity) are quantitatively discussed. (authors)
Additional details
Additional titles
- Original title (English)
- Global 1995
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- Edition ANS
- Imprint Place
- Paris (France)
- Imprint Title
- Global 1995
- Imprint Pagination
- 2032 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 149-157
Conference
- Title
- International conference on evaluation of emerging nuclear fuel cycle systems
- Dates
- 11-14 Sep 1995
- Place
- Versailles (France)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- France
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 29062065
- Subject category
- S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- ACTINIDE BURNER REACTORS; FUEL CYCLE; MIXED OXIDE FUELS; PUREX PROCESS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; TRANSMUTATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY SOURCES; EPITHERMAL REACTORS; FAST REACTORS; FUELS; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; NUCLEAR FUELS; REACTOR MATERIALS; REACTORS; REPROCESSING; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SOLID FUELS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT
Optional Information
- Notes
- 6 refs. Imprint:Global 1995