Published November 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of patients radiation dose during mammography imaging procedure

  • 1. Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
  • 2. College of Medical Radiologic Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, B.O.Box 1908, Khartoum (Sudan)
  • 3. INAYA Medical Collage, Nuclear Medicine Department, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
  • 4. Radiology Department, Riyadh Care Hospital, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
  • 5. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O.Box 422, Alkharj 11942 (Saudi Arabia)
  • 6. Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH (United Kingdom)
  • 7. Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
  • 8. Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor (Malaysia)

Description

Highlights: • The average glandular dose (AGD) during mammography procedures was evaluated. • The interpatient variation is due to the number of projections per procedure. • Estimated AGD is comparable with previous studies. • Diagnostic reference should base on the patient's age and breast density. This study investigates patients' dose levels during digital mammography procedures and proposes a local diagnostic reference level (DRL). The patient sample is 1055 patients who have been examined at the Riyadh Care Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All procedures were carried out for medically justified clinical conditions. All procedures were carried out using a direct digital mammography (DDR) radiology system. The mean and range of ESAK (mGy) were 5.19 ± 3.18 (0.33–29.9), while the mean AGD (mGy) is 1.3±(1.0–7.2) per procedure. The third quartile value for ESAK (mGy) and AGD (mGy) is 6 and 1.5, respectively. Measured ESAK (mGy) per procedure and estimated AGD are comparable with previous studies. The interpatient and interdepartmental variation is attributed mainly to the number of projections per procedure.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109680

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109680;
PII
S0969806X21003303;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Physics and Chemistry (1993)
Journal Volume
188
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0969-806X
CODEN
RPCHDM

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.