Evaluation of patients radiation dose during mammography imaging procedure
Creators
- 1. Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
- 2. College of Medical Radiologic Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, B.O.Box 1908, Khartoum (Sudan)
- 3. INAYA Medical Collage, Nuclear Medicine Department, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
- 4. Radiology Department, Riyadh Care Hospital, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
- 5. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O.Box 422, Alkharj 11942 (Saudi Arabia)
- 6. Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH (United Kingdom)
- 7. Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
- 8. Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor (Malaysia)
Description
Highlights: • The average glandular dose (AGD) during mammography procedures was evaluated. • The interpatient variation is due to the number of projections per procedure. • Estimated AGD is comparable with previous studies. • Diagnostic reference should base on the patient's age and breast density. This study investigates patients' dose levels during digital mammography procedures and proposes a local diagnostic reference level (DRL). The patient sample is 1055 patients who have been examined at the Riyadh Care Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All procedures were carried out for medically justified clinical conditions. All procedures were carried out using a direct digital mammography (DDR) radiology system. The mean and range of ESAK (mGy) were 5.19 ± 3.18 (0.33–29.9), while the mean AGD (mGy) is 1.3±(1.0–7.2) per procedure. The third quartile value for ESAK (mGy) and AGD (mGy) is 6 and 1.5, respectively. Measured ESAK (mGy) per procedure and estimated AGD are comparable with previous studies. The interpatient and interdepartmental variation is attributed mainly to the number of projections per procedure.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109680Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109680;
- PII
- S0969806X21003303;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Physics and Chemistry (1993)
- Journal Volume
- 188
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0969-806X
- CODEN
- RPCHDM
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54050163
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; HEALTH HAZARDS; HOSPITALS; MAMMARY GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIATION DOSES; SAUDI ARABIA
- Descriptors DEC
- ARAB COUNTRIES; ASIA; BODY; BUILDINGS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOSES; GLANDS; HAZARDS; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; MEDICINE; MIDDLE EAST; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.