Water use of electricity technologies: A global meta-analysis
- 1. Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, 2333 CC, Leiden (Netherlands)
- 2. Leiden University College The Hague, Leiden University, 2595 DG, The Hague (Netherlands)
- 3. Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, 2595 DA, The Hague (Netherlands)
Description
Highlights: • Renewables and carbon capture systems pose new challenges for the energy-water nexus. • The cooling type influences water use more than the thermal energy type. • The few country-specific estimates suggest that water use greatly varies regionally. • More transparent reporting of key characteristics of energy systems is advisable. • Water scarcity is mostly neglected, but important for mapping the energy transition. -- Abstract: Understanding the water use of power production is an important step to both a sustainable energy transition and an improved understanding of water conservation measures. However, there are large differences across the literature that currently present barriers to decision making. Here, the compiled inventory of the blue water use of power production from existing studies allowed to uncover the characteristics of water use and to investigate current uncertainties. The results show that photovoltaics, wind power, and run-of-the-river hydropower consume relatively little water, whereas reservoir hydropower and woody and herbaceous biomass can have an extremely large water footprint. The water consumption of power production can differ greatly across countries due to different geographic conditions. Only a few studies provided the values for the influencing factors of water use, such as the capacity factor. Values that are reported came mainly from assumptions and other literature rather than direct measurement. Omitting a life cycle stage may lead to significant underestimations. Water scarcity is attracting more attention, but the few existing results are not useable for a regional comparison due to data gaps and inconsistent measurements. In the future, a clear and detailed definition of the water footprint and system boundary of power production is essential to improving comparisons and energy systems modelling.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109391;
- PII
- S1364032119305994;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Journal Volume
- 115
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 1364-0321
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55020584
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S13: HYDRO ENERGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT; POWER GENERATION; RIVERS; SOLAR CELLS; WATER USE; WIND POWER
- Descriptors DEC
- AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; CONTROL; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; ELECTRIC POWER; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; POLLUTION CONTROL; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SIMULATION; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; SURFACE WATERS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.