The practical radius of a pencil beam in proton therapy
- 1. Division Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien (Austria)
- 2. Medical Radiation Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington (United Kingdom)
- 3. MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre/EBG MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt (Austria)
Description
The central Gaussian shaped high dose region of a pencil beam (PB) in light ion beam therapy (LIBT) is enveloped by a low dose region causing non-negligible field size effects and impairs the dose calculation accuracy considerably if the low dose envelope is not well modeled. The purpose of this study was to calculate the practical radius, R, at which a PB does not influence a field more than a certain accuracy level. Lateral dose profiles of proton beams in water were simulated using GATE/Geant4. Those lateral dose profiles were integrated numerically and used to calculate field size factors (FSFs). The R was then determined such, that the lateral dose at radii exceeding R can be neglected without compromising the FSF of a 20 cm × 20 cm field more than a desired accuracy level c. The practical radius R yielding c = 0.5% was compared to the frequently applied concept of full width at a ratio x of the maximum (FWxM). The sensitivity to variations of the beam width was tested by increasing the initial beam width σ of the clinical beam model by 0.5 and 1 mm, respectively. Neglecting the dose at radii exceeding R resulted in the desired FSF accuracy, whereas using the FW0.01%M cut resulted in varying accuracy. In order to yield a constant FSF accuracy, the ratio x in FWxM ranged from 0.003% to 0.065% of the maximum. In contrast to R, FWxM was sensitive to variations of the initial beam width. The maximum R over all depths was less than 7 cm for the low(62.4 MeV) and medium(148.2 MeV) proton energy beam, which suggests that a plane parallel ionization chamber exceeding that radius is sufficient to acquire laterally integrated depth dose distributions for those energies. However, this holds not true for the highest energy (252.7 MeV) or when including a range shifter (RaShi). The values of R are specific to our beam line configuration as the maximum R was depending on both, the scattering material in the Nozzle as well as the distance of the air-gap between Nozzle and phantom.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.06.003Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Zeitschrift fuer Medizinische Physik
- Journal Volume
- 31
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 166-174
- ISSN
- 0939-3889
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 52073570
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; BEAM PROFILES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; DISTANCE; ION BEAM THERAPY; IONIZATION CHAMBERS; MEV RANGE 100-1000; MEV RANGE 10-100; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHANTOMS; PROTON BEAMS; RADIATION DOSES; SCATTERING; SENSITIVITY; WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- BEAMS; CALCULATION METHODS; DOSES; ENERGY RANGE; EVALUATION; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MEDICINE; MEV RANGE; MOCKUP; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; NUCLEON BEAMS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIATION DETECTORS; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; SPATIAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Notes
- Special issue: Ion beam therapy. Pt. I