Published October 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Dynamic structural analysis of a fast shutter with a pneumatic actuator

  • 1. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, Mechanics and Control Processes Department, Computational Mechanichs Laboratory, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg (Russian Federation)
  • 2. Institut fuer Energieforschung – Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Association EURATOM-FZJ, Member of Trilateral Euregio Cluster, 52425 Juelich (Germany)

Description

Highlights: ► The dynamical simulations of cCXRS shutter with the use of the LS-DYNA explicit solver are presented and discussed. ► The results of the implicit and explicit solvers are compared; their pros and cons are pointed out. ► The simplified LS-DYNA shutter model for parametric studies has been built up and benchmarked against the full model. ► Oscillations of the shutter arms for different actuator flood times were studied. -- Abstract: Fast shutters can play important role for the ITER diagnostics. They protect diagnostic mirrors, especially the first ones closest to the plasma, between measurements, during dwell time and baking. In a nominal mode, as it is assumed, for example, for the ITER upper port plug no. 3 diagnostics, its shutter stays open ∼1 s and closed ∼21 s. The principal idea of the shutter concept is its ability to make fast transitions between the open and closed positions within fractions of second. A pneumatic actuator produces a pressure force to open or close the shutter. Due to the fast transient nature of the shutter operation, complicated by the parts' impact interaction, the FE codes using the explicit time integration scheme have an advantage over the implicit ones. The shutter operation is modeled using the explicit solver. Since the shutter dynamic behavior strongly depends on the actuator flood time, different time profiles of the actuator pressure rise (drop) has been verified, including a fast transient with duration of ∼0.1 s. The results of the implicit and explicit solvers are compared. Their pros and cons are pointed out. The system damping, estimations of energy loss and ways to specify damping in FE models are discussed in the paper

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.143

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.143;
PII
S0920-3796(13)00258-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
88
Journal Issue
9-10
Journal Page Range
p. 2133-2137
ISSN
0920-3796
CODEN
FEDEEE

Conference

Title
27. symposium on fusion technology
Acronym
SOFT-27
Dates
24-28 Sep 2012
Place
Liege (Belgium)

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45053984
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ACTUATORS; BAKING; BENCHMARKS; CLOSURES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DAMPING; ENERGY LOSSES; INTERACTIONS; ITER TOKAMAK; MIRRORS; OPERATION; OSCILLATIONS; PLASMA; SHUTTERS; SIMULATION
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; EVALUATION; HEATING; LOSSES; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.