Published December 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Predicting the return on the spot price of crude oil out-of-sample by conditioning on news-based uncertainty measures: Some new empirical results

Creators

Description

Highlights: • We apply Bayesian model averaging (BMA) to predict crude oil spot price returns. • We condition on news-based uncertainty measures pioneered by Baker et al. (2016). • BMA, where the predictive impact occurs via the volatility process performs well. • Results depend on the notion of out-of-sample prediction improvement. This study contributes to the growing literature that focuses on predicting crude oil spot price returns out-of-sample by conditioning on the news-based uncertainty measures pioneered by Baker et al. (2016). With the aim of providing new empirical results useful for future research, we apply a comprehensive Bayesian model averaging (BMA) framework that incorporates the following aspects: (i): Parameter instability, (ii): Model uncertainty, and (iii): Besides the conditional mean process, it allows predictors of the candidate models in the model set to impact the variable being predicted through the conditional volatility process or both processes. Applied to monthly news-based uncertainty and crude oil price data from 1985m1 through 2020m12, we observe that accounting for model uncertainty and allowing predictors to impact crude oil price returns exclusively through the conditional volatility process lead to the most consistent pattern of point (density) prediction accuracy gains relative to the benchmark. In contrast, the approach predominately relied on in the current literature, namely, allowing predictors to impact returns only through the conditional mean process does not lead to the same degree of point (density) prediction accuracy gains. Likewise, any further prediction accuracy gains from (i) are at best modest once (ii) and (iii) are accounted for. The largest relative gain occurs when predicting the left tail of the conditional return distribution one-month ahead. The statistical evidence of predictability also translates to economic gains.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105635

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105635;
PII
S0140988321004977;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
104
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54071131
Subject category
S02: PETROLEUM; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ACCOUNTING; ACCURACY; BENCHMARKS; FORECASTING; INSTABILITY; PETROLEUM; PETROLEUM INDUSTRY; PRICES; VOLATILITY
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; INDUSTRY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.