Comparative economic analysis of the Integral Molten Salt Reactor and an advanced PWR using the G4-ECONS methodology
- 1. Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Department of Nuclear Reactors, Prague (Czech Republic)
- 2. Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, TN (United States)
Description
The assessment of economic viability of a new reactor concept is crucial particularly during the early stages of its concept development. The G4-ECONS methodology provides a standardized top-down estimate of electricity cost and parametric sensitivities, not specifically targeted toward an accurate prediction of the final cost when deployed, but rather seeking an approximation of cost variations relative to other systems. This study presents an analysis of the Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR) concept in comparison with a consistent analysis of an advanced PWR reactor (represented by AP1000). Estimation of levelized unit electricity costs, as well as sensitivity analyses to the discount rate and uranium or SWU prices, are presented using this methodology.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.001Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.001;
- PII
- S0306-4549(16)30735-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Annals of Nuclear Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 99
- Journal Page Range
- p. 258-265
- ISSN
- 0306-4549
- CODEN
- ANENDJ
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48085462
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COST; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MOLTEN SALT REACTORS; PWR TYPE REACTORS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; URANIUM
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDES; ECONOMICS; ELEMENTS; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; EVALUATION; METALS; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.