Published August 1, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Treatment and Prognosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the External Auditory Canal and Middle Ear: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review of 87 Patients

  • 1. Department of Radiology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Clinical Radiology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka (Japan)
  • 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba (Japan)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba University, Chiba (Japan)
  • 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya (Japan)
  • 6. Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 7. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heart Life Hospital, Okinawa (Japan)
  • 8. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka (Japan)
  • 9. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa (Japan)
  • 10. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka (Japan)

Description

Purpose: To examine the relative roles of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in the management of patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the external auditory canal and middle ear. Methods and Materials: The records of 87 patients with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma who were treated between 1984 and 2005 were reviewed. Fifty-three patients (61%) were treated with surgery and radiotherapy (S + RT group) and the remaining 34 patients with radiotherapy alone (RT group). Chemotherapy was administered in 34 patients (39%). Results: The 5-year actuarial overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates for all patients were 55% and 54%, respectively. On univariate analysis, T stage (Stell's classification), treatment modality, and Karnofsky performance status had significant impact on DFS. On multivariate analysis, T stage and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors. Chemotherapy did not influence DFS. The 5-year DFS rate in T1, T2, and T3 patients was 83%, 45%, and 0 in the RT group (p < 0.0001) and 75%, 75%, and 46% in the S + RT group (p = 0.13), respectively. The 5-year DFS rate in patients with negative surgical margins, those with positive margins, and those with macroscopic residual disease was 83%, 55%, and 38%, respectively (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Radical radiotherapy is the treatment of choice for early-stage (T1) diseases, whereas surgery (negative surgical margins if possible) with radiotherapy is recommended as the standard care for advanced (T2-3) disease. Further clarification on the role of chemotherapy is necessary

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.052;
PII
S0360-3016(07)00246-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
68
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1326-1334
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
38104865
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
AUDITORY ORGANS; CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; REVIEWS; SURGERY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; SENSE ORGANS; STATISTICS; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved.