Is the issue of energy transition correctly posed in present debates?

As it is commonly stated that it would be possible to massively developed renewable energies in order to de-carbonate our energy system by getting rid of fossil and nuclear energies, the authors recall and discuss some facts. They outline that the solution depend on geographical and climatic constraints which are proper to each country, that renewable energies only represents about a quarter of our consumption and raise the problem of intermittency. Moreover, the present status of energy storage technology does not provide a viable and possible solution, and is still to be further developed. They also outline problems faced in Germany where coal fired plants had to be created to solve issues of electricity availability. They outline that France is one of the less carbon-emitting country, due to the importance of nuclear energy. Thus, they outline that realistic scenarios must be proposed in which nuclear will still have its role in a de-carbonated system, and with investments in basic, technological and industrial research on various fields (nuclear wastes and safety, energy storage, CO₂ capture and sequestration)