Published July 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Leak-Before-Break assessment of a welded piping based on 3D finite element method

  • 1. Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province (China)
  • 2. Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Energy and Safety Department, Villigen PSI (Switzerland)

Description

Highlights: • The effects of load reduction, strength match, welding width, load level, crack size and constraint are studied. • The results show that the LBB margin is dependent on the load level. • The results show that higher strength-match of WPJs will have higher crack-front constraints. • The results show that the engineering method has a high precision only if the width of weld is comparable to the crack depth. - Abstract: The paper studies the effects of the load reduction (discrepancy between designing and real loadings), strength match of the welded piping joint (WPJ), welding width, crack size and crack tip constraint on the Leak-Before-Break (LBB) assessment of a welded piping. The 3D finite element (FE) method is used in the study of a surge line of the steam generator in a nuclear power plant. It is demonstrated that the LBB margin is dependent on the loading level and the load reduction effect should be considered. When the loading is high enough, there is a quite large deviation between the J-integral calculated based on the real material property of WPJ and that calculated based on the engineering method, e.g. Zahoor handbook of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The engineering method assumes that the whole piping is made of the unique welding material in the calculation. As the influence of the strength matching and welding width is ignored in the engineering method for J-integral calculation, the engineering method has a sufficient precision only if the width of welding is comparable to the crack depth. Narrower welding width leads to higher constraint of the plastic deformation in the welding and larger high stress areas in the base for the low strength-match WPJ. Higher strength matching of WPJs has higher crack-front constraints.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.020

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.020;
PII
S0306-4549(16)31155-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Annals of Nuclear Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
105
Journal Page Range
p. 196-204
ISSN
0306-4549
CODEN
ANENDJ

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.