Abiotic oxidation of arsenite in natural and engineered systems: Mechanisms and related controversies over the last two decades (1999–2020)
Creators
- 1. Technology Innovation Center for Land Spatial Eco-restoration in Metropolitan Area, Ministry of Natural Resources, 3663N. Zhongshan Road, Shanghai 200062 (China)
- 2. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Biotransformation of Organic Solid Waste, Shanghai 200241 (China)
- 3. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241 (China)
Description
Highlights: • Various methods for As(III) oxidation are critically reviewed. • Some concerns and challenges in the sphere of As(III) oxidation are pointed out. • Low-cost, simple and effective methods for As(III) oxidation are recommended. • The controversies over oxidation mechanisms are discussed. Abiotic oxidation of toxic As(III) to As(V) is being deemed as a necessary step for the overall arsenic decontamination in both natural and engineered systems. Direct oxidation of As(III) by chemical oxidants, such as ozone, permanganate, ferrate, chlorine and chloramine, or naturally occurring minerals like Mn, Fe oxides, seems straightforward. Both O2 and H2O2 are ineffective for arsenite oxidation, but they can be activated by reducing substances like Fe2+, Fe0 to increase the oxidation rates. Photo-induced oxidation of As(III) has been demonstrated effective in Fe complexes or minerals, NO3-/NO2-, dissolved organic matter (DOM), peroxygens and TiO2 systems. Although a variety of oxidation methods have been developed over the past two decades, there remain many scientific and technical challenges that must be overcome before the rapid progress in basic knowledge can be translated into environmental benefits. To better understand the trends in the existing data and to identify the knowledge gaps, this review describes in detail the complicated mechanisms for As(III) oxidation by various methods and emphasizes on the conflicting data and explanation. Some prevailing concerns and challenges in the sphere of As(III) oxidation are also pointed out so as to appeal to researchers for further investigations.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125488Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125488;
- PII
- S0304389421004519;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Journal Volume
- 414
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0304-3894
- CODEN
- JHMAD9
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54028749
- Subject category
- S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHLORAMINES; CHLORINE; DECONTAMINATION; ELECTRON TRANSFER; FERRATES; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; NITRATES; NITRITES; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; ORGANIC MATTER; OXIDATION; OXIDIZERS; OZONE; PERMANGANATES; TITANIUM OXIDES
- Descriptors DEC
- AMINES; CHALCOGENIDES; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CLEANING; ELEMENTS; HALOGENS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; IRON COMPOUNDS; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; MATTER; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN OXIDES; NONMETALS; ORGANIC CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC HALOGEN COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PEROXIDES; TITANIUM COMPOUNDS; TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.