Published 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of patient doses and lens radiation doses to interventional cardiologists in a nationwide survey in Chile

  • 1. Medical Technology Department, Study Center in Radiological Sciences CECRAD, Health Sciences Faculty and CHIDE, Tarapaca University, Arica (Chile)
  • 2. Radiology Department, Complutense University, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Madrid 28040 (Spain)
  • 3. Radiology Department, Complutense University, Madrid 28040 (Spain)
  • 4. Hemodynamic Department, Cardiovascular Service, Luis CalvoMackenna Hospital, Santiago (Chile)
  • 5. Centro de Terapia Endovascular, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago (Chile)

Description

The objective of this study was to perform a nationwide survey in Chile to determine dose levels to patients and staff in four risk scenarios during cardiac catheterisation procedures. Different phantom thicknesses of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) were used to simulate adult patients. Scenario 1: 10-min fluoroscopy and 800 cine frames for 20 cm of PMMA; Scenario 2: 10-min fluoroscopy and 800 cine frames for 28 cm of PMMA; Scenario 3: 30-min fluoroscopy and 2400 cine frames for 20 cm of PMMA; Scenario 4: 30-min fluoroscopy and 2400 cine frames for 28 cm of PMMA. The average values regarding dose-area product and scattered doses at the cardiologist eye lens achieved for the four scenarios were 94, 249, 281, 747 Gy cm2 and 0.3, 0.8, 0.9 and 2.5 mSv, respectively. Large variations in radiation doses received by both patients and staff for the same type of procedure suggest that optimising procedure protocols and using the most effective types of protective devices may substantially reduce the dose values found here. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct118

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Journal Volume
157
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 36-43
ISSN
0144-8420

Optional Information

Notes
50 refs