A method for comparing impacts with real targets to impacts onto the IAEA unyielding target

A mathematically rigorous method is developed for relating impacts with yielding targets to lower velocity impacts with unyielding targets. The method correctly models the mechanics of the impact and the conversion of kinetic energy to strain energy. An important result shown by the example problem is that apparent target hardness depends on the stiffness of the impacting package. For a cask with impact limiters a 26.8 m/s impact onto hard soil results in equivalent forces as a 13.9 m/s impact onto an unyielding target. For the same cask without impact limiters a 26.8 m/s impact onto hard soil is equivalent to a 1.74 m/s impact onto an unyielding target. This is one reason why non-technical members of the public often have difficulty realizing the severity of the regulatory impact. For most people, objects such as trucks and bridge columns appear to be very hard, but to many radioactive material shipping packages these objects are relatively soft. The method discussed in this paper for relating impacts with yielding targets to lower velocity impacts with unyielding targets helps to explain how the regulatory impact accident provides a high degree of safety to the public. This methodology is relatively simple to use, and can be applied to the 'What if' scenarios brought up by interveners. (J.P.N.)