Published November 2001 | Version v1
Journal article

New scans from old: digital reformatting knee MRI

  • 1. Department of Radiography and Medical Imaging, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria (Australia)
  • 2. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Medical School, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria (Australia)
  • 3. Victorian Epilepsy Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria (Australia)
  • 4. Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria (Australia)

Description

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of cartilage volume and bone areas measured from a 3D knee MRI sequence reformatted in different planes. Methods: MRI of 16 adult subjects (9 females, 7 males, age range 45–68 years) were acquired in the sagittal plane using a 3D T1-weighted fat suppressed spoiled gradient echo sequence. Medial and lateral tibial cartilage volumes were determined by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane and from the same image data reformatted in the coronal plane. Tibial plateau areas were determined by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane and reformatted in the axial plane. Results: Cartilage volumes calculated from the original sagittal acquisition and data reformatted into the coronal plane were similar. The average over- or under-estimation of the lateral and medial cartilage volume from the reformatted coronal scans compared to the sagittal sequences was 4.6% and 9.8% respectively. Similar medial and lateral tibial plateau areas were obtained when the sagittal data was reformatted in the axial plane. The average over- and under-estimate of lateral and medial tibial plateau areas from the reformatted axial scans compared to the originally acquired sagittal sequences was 6.5% and 6.8% respectively. Conclusion: Knee data acquired via MRI in one plane can be reformatted into different planes, providing comparable cartilage volumes and bone areas. As different planes through the knee may provide better visualization of different joint structures, this method may be useful clinically and as a research tool, while avoiding the cost associated with the prolonged scanning times associated with acquiring multiple planes.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/radi.2001.0335

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1053/radi.2001.0335;
PII
S1078817401903359;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
7
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 221-226
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
51002223
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; BONE JOINTS; CARTILAGE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NMR IMAGING
Descriptors DEC
ANIMAL TISSUES; BODY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; ORGANS; PROCESSING; SKELETON

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.