Study proves effectiveness of alternative test kits for COVID-19 (Arabic Edition)
Creators
Description
The primordial days of the COVID-19 outbreak led to a rapid surge in demand — and subsequent shortage — of many consumables, from household goods and protective equipment to the ingredients and substances needed to test for the virus. As the world grappled with the newfound need to mass-test for COVID-19, laboratories turned to real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT–PCR). Real time RT–PCR is the most accurate laboratory method to detect, track and study COVID-19 (see page 8 to learn more), however, its widespread use strained resources and led some laboratories to seek more readily available and cheaper alternatives. A study to test the performance and quality of some of these alternative resources was recently conducted by the IAEA and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), in collaboration with the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES). Its results have implications for the ongoing fight against COVID-19 in developing countries and beyond.
Availability note (English)
Also available on-line: https://www.iaea.org/ar/bulletin/62-3Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- IAEA Bulletin (Online)
- Journal Volume
- 62
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 14-15
- ISSN
- 1564-2690
INIS
- Country of Publication
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53037140
- Subject category
- S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- AGRICULTURE; CHAIN REACTIONS; CORONAVIRUSES; PERFORMANCE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMERASES
- Descriptors DEC
- DISEASES; ENZYMES; GENE AMPLIFICATION; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; MICROORGANISMS; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PARASITES; PHOSPHORUS-GROUP TRANSFERASES; PROTEINS; TRANSFERASES; VIRAL DISEASES; VIRUSES; ZOONOTIC DISEASES