ON THE DENSITY PROFILE OF THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER M92
Creators
- 1. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana Science Data Center (ASDC), c/o ESRIN, via G. Galilei, I-00044 Frascati (Italy)
- 2. Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano (Italy)
- 3. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, Calle Via Lactea, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife (Spain)
- 4. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF)-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, I-00044 Monte Porzio Catone (Italy)
- 5. Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7 (Canada)
- 6. INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via G. B. Tiepolo 11, I-40131 Trieste (Italy)
- 7. Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena (Chile)
Description
We present new number density and surface brightness profiles for the globular cluster M92 (NGC 6341). These profiles are calculated from optical images collected with the CCD mosaic camera MegaCam at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope. The ground-based data were supplemented with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric catalog. Special care was taken to discriminate candidate cluster stars from field stars and to subtract the background contamination from both profiles. By examining the contour levels of the number density, we found that the stellar distribution becomes clumpy at radial distances larger than ∼13', and there is no preferred orientation of contours in space. We performed detailed fits of King and Wilson models to the observed profiles. The best-fit models underestimate the number density inside the core radius. Wilson models better represent the observations, in particular in the outermost cluster regions: the good global agreement of these models with the observations suggests that there is no need to introduce an extra-tidal halo to explain the radial distribution of stars at large radial distances. The best-fit models for the number density and the surface brightness profiles are different, even though they are based on the same observations. Additional tests support the evidence that this fact reflects the difference in the radial distribution of the stellar tracers that determine the observed profiles (main-sequence stars for the number density, bright evolved stars for the surface brightness).
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/103Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Astronomical Journal (New York, N.Y. Online)
- Journal Volume
- 145
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- [11 p.]
- ISSN
- 1538-3881
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 44085914
- Subject category
- S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BRIGHTNESS; CATALOGS; CHARGE-COUPLED DEVICES; DENSITY; GALAXY CLUSTERS; GRAIN ORIENTATION; MAIN SEQUENCE STARS; SKY; SPACE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STAR CLUSTERS; SURFACES; TELESCOPES
- Descriptors DEC
- DISTRIBUTION; DOCUMENT TYPES; MICROSTRUCTURE; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; ORIENTATION; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; STARS