Published April 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Emerging methods and tools for environmental risk assessment, decision-making, and policy for nanomaterials: summary of NATO Advanced Research Workshop

  • 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory (United States)
  • 2. U.S. Army ERDC (United States)
  • 3. Defense Research and Development Canada (Canada)
  • 4. Intertox Inc. and Bioengineering Group (United States)
  • 5. Rice University, ICON (United States)
  • 6. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment (United States)
  • 7. University of Montreal, Environment Canada and Department of Chemistry (Canada)
  • 8. University of Rochester, Department of Environmental Medicine (United States)
  • 9. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental Engineering, NanoDTU (Denmark)
  • 10. Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment (TERA) (United States)
  • 11. Air Force Research Laboratory (United States)
  • 12. Health Canada (Canada)
  • 13. Marian Gertner Institute for Medical Nanosystems, Tel Aviv University, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine (Israel)
  • 14. School of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University College Dublin, Irish Centre for Colloid Science and Biomaterials (Ireland)
  • 15. Trent University (Canada)

Description

Nanomaterials and their associated technologies hold promising opportunities for the development of new materials and applications in a wide variety of disciplines, including medicine, environmental remediation, waste treatment, and energy conservation. However, current information regarding the environmental effects and health risks associated with nanomaterials is limited and sometimes contradictory. This article summarizes the conclusions of a 2008 NATO workshop designed to evaluate the wide-scale implications (e.g., benefits, risks, and costs) of the use of nanomaterials on human health and the environment. A unique feature of this workshop was its interdisciplinary nature and focus on the practical needs of policy decision makers. Workshop presentations and discussion panels were structured along four main themes: technology and benefits, human health risk, environmental risk, and policy implications. Four corresponding working groups (WGs) were formed to develop detailed summaries of the state-of-the-science in their respective areas and to discuss emerging gaps and research needs. The WGs identified gaps between the rapid advances in the types and applications of nanomaterials and the slower pace of human health and environmental risk science, along with strategies to reduce the uncertainties associated with calculating these risks.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
Journal Volume
11
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 513-527
ISSN
1388-0764

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
42051747
Subject category
S77: NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; HEALTH HAZARDS; MEETINGS; NANOSTRUCTURES; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT
Descriptors DEC
HAZARDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.