Published June 2, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Radiotherapy quality assurance review in a multi-center randomized trial of limited-disease small cell lung cancer: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) trial 0202

  • 1. Clinical Trials and Practice Support Division, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 (Japan)
  • 2. JCOG radiotherapy committee, Clinical Trials and Practice Support Division, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 (Japan)
  • 3. JCOG lung cancer study group, Thoracic Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 (Japan)

Description

The purpose of this study was to analyze the radiotherapy (RT) quality assurance (QA) assessment in Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0202, which was the first trial that required on-going RT QA review in the JCOG. JCOG 0202 was a multi-center phase III trial comparing two types of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer. RT requirements included a total dose of 45 Gy/30 fx (bis in die, BID/twice a day) without heterogeneity correction; elective nodal irradiation (ENI) of 30 Gy; at least 1 cm margin around the clinical target volume (CTV); and interfraction interval of 6 hours or longer. Dose constraints were defined in regards to the spinal cord and the lung. The QA assessment was classed as per protocol (PP), deviation acceptable (DA), violation unacceptable (VU), and incomplete/not evaluable (I/NE). A total of 283 cases were accrued, of which 204 were fully evaluable, excluding 79 I/NE cases. There were 18 VU in gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage (8% of 238 evaluated); 4 VU and 23 DA in elective nodal irradiation (ENI) (2% and 9% of 243 evaluated, respectively). Some VU were observed in organs at risk (1 VU in the lung and 5 VU in the spinal cord). Overall RT compliance (PP + DA) was 92% (187 of 204 fully evaluable). Comparison between the former and latter halves of the accrued cases revealed that the number of VU and DA had decreased. The results of the RT QA assessment in JCOG 0202 seemed to be acceptable, providing reliable results

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-16; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2698865

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Oncology (Online)
Journal Volume
4
Journal Page Range
p. 16
ISSN
1748-717X

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47029344
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMBINED THERAPY; IRRADIATION; JAPAN; LUNGS; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; REVIEWS; SPINAL CORD
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Sanuki-Fujimoto et al
Notes
PMCID: PMC2698865; PUBLISHER-ID: 1748-717X-4-16; PMID: 19490617; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2698865; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.