Published June 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Feasibility of investment in Blue Growth multiple-use of space and multi-use platform projects; results of a novel assessment approach and case studies

  • 1. MaREI ERI, University College Cork (UCC), Ireland (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Aquabiotech, Naggar st, Mosta (Malta)
  • 3. BVG Associates, Cricklade, Swindon SN6 6HY (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Albatern, Midlothian Innovation Centre, Roslin, Scotland (United Kingdom)
  • 5. Heriot Watt University, Orkney, Scotland (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • A comprehensive history of multiple use of space blue growth. • New metrics for comparing salmon to megawatts are presented. • Method and criteria for ranking potential investments in blue growth business models. • Profitable case studies described involving electricity, water, mussels and fish. -- Abstract: Blue Growth is the creation of economic activity and jobs at sea, while multiple use of space makes efficient use of the available sea area by combining industries. Clearly there are many combinations and many value propositions. However, most technologies to date are considered blue sky concepts, with little robust techno-economic analysis demonstrating profitability. The paper begins by providing a comprehensive review of Blue Growth and multi-use in Blue Growth; both in policy as well as the wide range of current technologies, including ocean energy, offshore wind energy, offshore aquaculture and desalination. The Maribe H2020 project provides the vehicle for the research element of the paper. The major contribution is a new methodology for selecting, filtering, developing and ranking business propositions for multiple-use of space (MUS) and multi-use platforms (MUP). Application of the method for the first time identified three case studies where Blue Growth combination projects can be economically viable, with attractive internal rate of return (IRRs). Results presented for the case studies report standard investment metrics and show the relative contribution of each product (energy, food, water) to the system profitability, as well as socio-economic impact. Existing companies were fully engaged in the process. Co-creation between sector experts and industry led to both improved business value propositions and robust assessment of investment readiness. In contrast to the presumption that large scale platforms are commercially attractive, the highest ranking case study companies required smaller capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operated in niche subsectors. In conclusion, the positive economic performance of the case studies should provide confidence for the EC as well as investors that MUS and MUP have viable economic futures leading towards commercialisation. The macro and micro assessment methods will be particularly useful in other Blue Economy contexts and in other multiple product contexts.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.060;
PII
S1364032119300589;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal Volume
107
Journal Page Range
p. 338-359
ISSN
1364-0321

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55020309
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AQUACULTURE; BUSINESS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ECONOMY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INVESTMENT; PERFORMANCE
Descriptors DEC
ECONOMICS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.