Let it flow: Modeling ecological benefits and hydropower production impacts of banning zero-flow events in a large regulated river system

Highlights: • High frequency and duration of zero-flow events were documented in the regulated Ume River System. • The hydropower stations stand still between 9—55% of the time a hydrologically normal year, resulting in periods of stagnant water. • Introducing minimum discharge equivalent to mean annual low flow would create 240 ha of permanent lotic habitat. • Another 107 ha of similar lotic habitat could be created after structural rehabilitation of the streambed along river reaches. • Introducing minimum discharge in the river system would result in 0.5% loss of hydropower production annually. Hydropeaking, defined as rapid and frequent changes in flow to optimize hydropower production, is an increasingly common procedure negatively affecting lotic habitats in riverine ecosystems. An important aspect of hydropeaking is zero-flow events, occurring when hydropower stations are stopped due to low energy demand or low electricity prices. We quantified the ecological benefits and consequences for hydropower production of restricting zero-flow events. The 19 major hydropower stations in the Ume River system in northern Sweden stand still with no discharge 9% to 55% of the time a hydrologically normal year, transforming lotic habitat to stagnant water. The duration of zero-flow events is exacerbated in dry years, with no discharge for 28% of the time in a typical station, to be compared with 7% in a wet year. Zero-flow events affect the behavior of fish, altering the fish community, and potentially result in low oxygen levels and low food supply to filter-feeding macroinvertebrates. We modelled the consequences of restricting zero-flow events by introducing minimum flows equaling mean annual low flow or higher for the entire Ume River catchment. The measure would result in an additional 240 ha of shallow lotic habitat with gravel to boulder streambeds having flow velocity exceeding 0.1 m/s, i.e. suitable for lotic species such as grayling Thymallus thymallus. In addition, the measure would enable creating another 107 ha of similar habitat after structural rehabilitation of river reaches. All measures would result in a mean loss of hydropower production of 0.5% per year for the entire river system, 98% of which would occur between May and October when the demand for electricity is lower. Hydropower production would also be partly moved from daytime to nighttime. As zero-flow events are common in several other river systems, restrictions on their frequency and duration could be implemented in many areas.