Published June 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Does directed technological change favor energy? Firm-level evidence from Portugal

  • 1. Department of Economics and BRU-Business Research Unit, ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon (Portugal)

Description

Highlights: • Among Portuguese firms, technological change is generally biased more towards fuel than electricity. • Considering the case of Portugal, this implies that technological change favors non-renewable energy instead of renewables. • Market size effect is likely to overwhelm price effect, so energy prices alone may not be an optimal policy tool to induce technological change. • Labor is the main driver for economic growth, while returns to capital are low. Total factor productivity growth is moderate. • There is much space for improving firm performance by eliminating technical inefficiency. Economic performance is closely related with energy consumption, the major part of which still comes from non-renewable sources. While endeavoring to promote renewable energy, policy makers are interested in technological change that also increases energy efficiency. However, both growth models of directed technological change and microeconomic theories regarding innovation suggest that technological change is not necessarily biased towards energy. In order to investigate directed technological change at the micro level, this paper applies stochastic frontier analysis to firm data for 32 economic subsectors, with respect to output produced with four inputs: capital, labor, electricity and fuel. Subsectors demonstrate different levels of technical inefficiency, which could be induced by capital deepening and higher share of financial income in total revenue. Output elasticity of labor is generally high among the subsectors, emphasizing labor as the main driver for economic growth. Output elasticity of capital is low overall, although a few subsectors enjoy better marginal returns. In most subsectors, technological change is biased the most towards labor; between electricity and fuel, technological change has favored fuel in more cases. We infer that the market size effect is likely to overwhelm others in deciding the direction of technological change. Thus, policy should include tools in addition to the energy price in order to induce technological change.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105248

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105248;
PII
S0140988321001535;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
98
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53107756
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S32: ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION;
Descriptors DEI
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; INCOME; PERFORMANCE; PRICES; PRODUCTIVITY; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
Descriptors DEC
EFFICIENCY; ENERGY SOURCES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.