Published 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Whole-body MR imaging in suspected physical child abuse. Comparison with skeletal survey and bone scintigraphy findings from the PEDIMA prospective multicentre study

  • 1. Radiology Department, CHU Rennes, F-35200, Rennes (France)
  • 2. Pediatric Radiology, service de Radiologie, Ramsay - Générale de Santé, University Hospital Charles Nicolle - Radiology, Hôpital Privé de l'Estuaire, 505 rue Irène Joliot Curie, 76620, Le Havre (France)
  • 3. Radiology Department, CHU Tours, Tours (France)
  • 4. Nuclear Medicine Department, CRLC Rennes, Rennes (France)
  • 5. Nuclear Medicine Department, CRLC Henri Becquerel, Rouen (France)
  • 6. CHU Nantes, Nuclear Medicine Department, Université de Nantes, CNRS, Inserm, CRCINA, Nantes (France)
  • 7. Public Heatlh and Epidemiology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes (France)
  • 8. Research and Innovation Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes (France)
  • 9. Pediatric Radiology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Bicêtre AP-HP, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre (France)

Description

To assess the contribution of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) in addition to skeletal survey (SS) in detecting traumatic bone lesions and soft-tissue injuries in suspected child abuse. In this prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study, children less than 3 years of age with suspected physical abuse were recruited. Each child underwent SS, BS and WBMRI. A blinded first review was performed in consensus by five paediatric radiologists and three nuclear medicine physicians. A second review investigated discrepancies reported between the modalities using a consensus result of all modalities as the reference standard. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and corresponding 95% confidence interval for each imaging modality (SS, WBMRI and BS) and for the combinations [SS + WBMRI] and [SS + BS]. One hundred seventy children were included of which sixty-four had at least one lesion. In total, 146 lesions were included. The sensitivity and specificity of each examination were, respectively, as follows: 88.4% [95% CI, 82.0-93.1] and 99.7% [95% CI, 99.5-99.8] for the SS, 69.9% [95% CI, 61.7-77.2] and 99.5% [95% CI, 99.2-99.7] for WBMRI and 54.8% [95% CI, 46.4-63.0] and 99.7% [95% CI, 99.5-99.9] for BS. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 95.9% [95% CI, 91.3-98.5] and 99.2% [95% CI, 98.9-99.4] for the combination SS + WBMRI and 95.2% [95% CI, 90.4-98.1] and 99.4% [95% CI, 99.2-99.6] for the combination SS + BS, with no statistically significant difference between them. SS was the most sensitive independent imaging modality; however, the additional combination of either WBMRI or BS examinations offered an increased accuracy.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07896-9

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
31
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 8069-8080
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3

Optional Information