Published 1986 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Social considerations relative to the siting of a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility in Canada

  • 1. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Ottawa, ON (Canada)

Description

This paper discusses a survey and several case studies. The survey, by Decima in Ontario, shows that the public do not distinguish between high-level and low-level wastes, and they do not believe that science knows how to handle the wastes. The U.S. case studies are Hanford, and in Texas. The example of Hanford shows that opposition to a low-level waste disposal site may continue long after it is opened. The author considers that the Texas example shows the futility of seeking opposition instead of seeking an acceptable site. The Canadian examples are of hazardous waste sites (uncomplicated by radioactive waste) in Alberta and Ontario. The choice of Swan Hills in Alberta was determined by the economics of the area; whereas in Ontario, mainly scientific criteria prevailed

Part of:
Proceedings of the Canadian Nuclear Society 2. international conference on radioactive waste management

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Proceedings of the Canadian Nuclear Society 2. international conference on radioactive waste management
Imprint Pagination
821 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 256-260.
Report number
INIS-mf--12730

Conference

Title
Canadian Nuclear Society 2. international conference on radioactive waste management.
Dates
7-11 Sep 1986.
Place
Winnipeg, MB (Canada).

Optional Information